Like all those involved in healthcare I take delirium very seriously. I share in the collective determination to improve our approach, understanding and care of those experiencing this serious condition.
To improve it is important that critical thinking is given room.
This post is about the validated 4AT Rapid Assessment Test for Delirium:
In a recent medical educational lecture organised by Healthcare Improvement Scotland, the 4AT was described as a “screening” test.
One of the authors of the 4AT Rapid Assessment Test described it recently as a “screening tool”:
There seems to be a lack of consistency in the stated purpose of this test/tool. Has this test/tool been validated for screening or has it been validated for assessment? This is an important scientific and ethical matter in terms of how this test/tool may be both validated and implemented