on being deleted by the Public Involvement Officer (HIS) of the Scottish Medicines Consortium

VOX Scotland, the national mental health service user led organisation advertised in their most recent E-bulletin the forthcoming conference of the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) on 24 March 2015:

And so, on 30 January, I went through the hyperlink to the SMC website which had this information:

“The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) is holding a conference to engage the voluntary sector in its work.  The event, which takes place on Tuesday 24 March, will see delegates hear from a range of speakers from SMC, voluntary sector and the Scottish Government, covering topics including recent changes at SMC, how organisations can engage in the process to ensure that the patient and carer voice is heard and the view from the Scottish Government. There will also be a number of workshops which will focus on issues including methods and techniques for gathering information about the patient and carer experience and understanding the SMC decision making processes.

This event, which will be held at the Teacher Building, 14 St Enoch Square, Glasgow, is aimed at all patient/carer groups and voluntary sector organisations who are interested in being involved in the appraisal of new medicines in Scotland. This includes both those who have sent in submissions to SMC in the past and those who have never taken part but are interested in the SMC appraisal process for new medicines. There is no charge to attend this event.

There will also be a number of workshops for delegates to attend.”

[I’m a member of the Health and Social Care Alliance, and had been invited on 7 February 2014 to speak at their event ”A Question of Ethics: Members discussion on the ALLIANCE’s relationship with the pharmaceutical industry’.  I was unable to attend due to being unwell, however I wrote a piece which was distributed at the event: “I believe that taking money from Big Pharma is ethically wrong“.]

I thought the Scottish Medicines Consortium event would be useful for me to attend, particularly since I have been supporting the work of Dr Peter Gordon in his Sunshine Act for Scotland Petition that has been going through Scottish Parliament.

Therefore I ticked on the link to the Eventbrite registration process and booked a place at the SMC conference.  Put the date in my diary and was looking forward to hearing about the “SMC appraisal process for new drugs”

However out of the blue I received an Email on 2 February from the SMC Public Involvement Officer, James Stewart (HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT SCOTLAND – SD039) saying:

Dear Chrys,

Thank you for your interest in our upcoming event on 24 March.  This event is aimed solely at voluntary sector organisations which are either registered charities or voluntary organisations which are constituted and therefore eligible to make a Patient Group submission to SMC. The main purpose of the event is to provide information and support which will help patient groups who are submitting to SMC.  All attendees at the event have be there as representatives from a charity or voluntary organisation due to the aim of the event and the limited places we have available.  I noted from the details that you have put down on the sign up form that you have not put down a specific charity or voluntary organisation that you are there to represent.  Therefore, if you are attending to represent a voluntary organisation could you please give me the details of the organisation and your role/job title, so that I can amend this on the form.  If you are not there to represent a specific organisation, then unfortunately I will need to cancel your place at the event.

If you have any questions about any of this, please get in touch.

I did get in touch, over a few Emails, saying I was an Alliance member, had run a voluntary sector organisation Peer Support Fife but had to stop due to caring duties and funding stopping.   I did ask if I was the only person being moderated in this way.  It felt discriminatory.

I explained that it had said on the SMC website that the event was for “those who have never taken part but are interested in the SMC appraisal process for new medicines”.   That was me.  I copied in both Ian Welsh, CEO, and Irene Oldfather, Director, of the Alliance, to the Emails.

However it appears that my name has been deleted from the database of delegates.  Excluded yet again by another Healthcare Improvement Scotland Officer.  From a key event where my questioning voice could have been captured, and brought a bit of balance and insight, from the carer and psychiatric survivor perspective.




4 thoughts on “on being deleted by the Public Involvement Officer (HIS) of the Scottish Medicines Consortium

  1. Certainly looks like you have every reason to feel annoyed and frustrated at this Chrys.Seems to make the whole meeting just a whitewash.You speak out so effectively, and by rights are just the sort of person who should be there.Seems to make a mockery of the whole purpose of the meeting

  2. I agree with Carol. For you to be excluded by the “Public Engagement Officer” of Healthcare Improvement Scotland makes complete mockery of this SMC meeting.

    Healthcare Improvement Scotland’s reputation will be damaged. And so it should be. Any such false promises of engagement with Scotland occurs to me as a twisted approach and one that I personally condemn. Is it the Scottish Parliament, the Health and Sports Committee, that hold Healthcare Improvement to account? Perhaps you could copy your experience to the Convener and Clerk of this Committee?

    Richard Norris, Chair of the Health Council, is also seeking “stronger voices”. It would be helpful to have his thoughts on your experiences of repeated exclusion.

    I should make clear I have interest here. As an NHS Consultant in Scotland for over 20 years I found that I was not “engaged” by Healthcare Improvement Scotland in delirium improvement work.

    • Peter thanks for commenting. I have found it to be “meaningless” rather than “meaningful” in terms of involving people with lived experience in consultations or in other mental health matters.

      Your point about hearing from Richard Norris is useful. I think I have a strong voice and strong opinions but I’ve not found this to be welcomed in Scotland’s mental health world. Rather they seem to prefer conformity, compliance and keeping quiet if having a questioning or critical voice.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s